Sunday, May 29, 2016


 

That's a healthy boost over the already-powerful Mercedes-AMG GT S with 503 horses.

The first true sports car out of the newly-dubbed Mercedes-AMG, the GT S, is already quick and incredibly capable on the track. When we drove it, we called it "a car that opens up the more you push it—and that inspires confidence to push it even more on the next lap." So when we found out it would be getting an even-faster version, we were excited. And with this new detail, it sounds like it'll be an absolute ripper.
That's the word according to AutoCar, which claims the GT R will debut at Goodwood this year and will feature an upgraded V8 making 570 horsepower. That would be quite a bump over the 503 horsepower the GT S makes and more than 100 more than the base GT's 462 horsepower. That sounds great to us, but considering AutoCar doesn't name a source, we'll have to wait for the official announcement to be sure. 
But don't expect the GT R to be just about straight-line speed. AMG boss Tobias Moers has said one of their goals is to balance driving dynamics with that extra power. Watching it test on the Nurburgring, it looks like Moers and his team are on the right track.
 If Mercedes does end up debuting the AMG GT R at Goodwood, we'll get to see it some time around June 23rd.
The Next Panamera Turbo Will Lap the 'Ring Faster Than the Porsche Carrera GT
Alfa Romeo Could Replace the 4C With a Giulia-Based Coupe by 2020

Monday, May 9, 2016

2016 Ford C-Max and C-Max Energi

Ordinary . . . and that's a good thing for a hybrid to be.

Quick-Take Review
Overview: Ford’s C-Max hybrid and its plug-in-hybrid sibling, the C-Max Energi, have been on sale here in the United States since 2013. A decade before arriving stateside, they were introduced in Europe as typical gasoline-powered high-roof wagons. One look at the Maxes’ styling, and you understand they’re aging. Both use the same hybrid powertrain—a gasoline-fed four-cylinder engine mated to an electric motor—but the C-Max Energi’s larger battery, which can be topped up using an external charger, allows for more electric-only driving. The C-Max siblings compete against a range of hybrids: the C-Max hybrid against the Toyota Prius V, and the C-Max Energi against the Prius Plug-In and the Chevrolet Volt. Both Fords stand out by driving and looking more mainstream than other hybrids.
What’s New: Not much, in fact. Since their U.S. debut three years ago, the biggest change to the C-Max pair was Ford’s downgrading of their EPA fuel-economy estimates after customers complained that the figures were unattainable. Ford said the disconnect between real-world efficiency and the EPA figures could be chalked up to the (completely legal) method of deriving the C-Max’s fuel economy from that of the Fusion hybrid, an altogether different car that happens to share its powertrain with the C-Max. Now standard is Ford’s latest infotainment system, Sync 3, which works far better than its old infotainment system. The real news is that sometime soon, likely next year, the C-Max will inherit the European models’ upgraded looks.
What We Like: The C-Max and the C-Max Energi drive very well for hybrids, and they very nearly feel like ordinary vehicles. That’s a compliment. With underpinnings similar to those beneath the fun-to-drive Focus compact sedan and hatchback, the C-Maxes go down the road comfortably and competently. Sporty the Fords are not, but they respond more positively to braking and steering inputs than even the latest Toyota Prius (which is improved in that regard relative to its predecessor) and, again, go about their business with a minimum of weirdness. The gas-electric powertrain pulls well, and the C-Max Energi’s extra electric juice helps quicken its acceleration slightly; in our testing, it went from zero to 60 mph in 7.9 seconds versus 8.8 seconds for the plain C-Max hybrid. The cabin is comfortable, with plenty of headroom and a nice, tall seating position; the dashboard layout is conventional and attractive, with soft-touch materials and easy ergonomics. The fitment of Ford’s new Sync 3 touchscreen display cures one of our bigger gripes with the 2013–2015 C-Maxes, their finicky MyFord Touch setup. Sync 3 mercifully brings with it larger on-screen buttons and easier-to-navigate menus.
What We Don’t Like: The C-Max Energi’s ability to charge up at a public EV charger or at home and then scoot about on electricity alone is great, but the battery runs out of juice quickly, meaning most of the time you’ll be running around in hybrid mode. In a world where the Chevrolet Volt can squeeze 53 miles from its battery before kicking over to hybrid mode, the C-Max’s claimed 19-mile EV-only range (which runs down quicker in reality, where folks use the climate-control system and drive as if they have someplace to be) is doing less and less to justify the Energi’s higher sticker price. And although the C-Maxes’ software was revised for better real-world fuel economy in 2013, we’ve never come close to either C-Max’s EPA-estimated fuel economy (a combined 40 mpg for the hybrid, 38 mpg for the Energi), gathering figures between 32 and 33 mpg. (We’ve seen 44 mpg and 47 mpg in separate tests of the new Prius.) Of course, the EPA’s fuel-economy test has some trouble when it comes to evaluating hybrids, but with the newest Prius returning more than 10 mpg better in our testing, the C-Max’s numbers don’t pencil as well as they once did.
Verdict: Mainstream looks, mainstream driving experience, mainstream fuel economy.

2017 Porsche 911 Carrera 4S Coupe

Turbocharging doesn't diminish the all-weather daily driver.

First Drive Review
The weather gods of Northern California cooperated by hurling rain at our Porsche 911 Carrera 4S during a 250-mile drive through the Mendocino National Forest up to the region of misty mountains and storm-lashed shoals known tantalizingly as the Lost Coast. What better challenge could you wish for when first encountering the latest all-wheel-drive Porsche 911 than to soak down the few undulating asphalt lanes that crisscross this wooded, moss-draped landscape? (This is a rhetorical question; don’t answer.)
As has been well documented here, Porsche is rebooting the base 911 Carrera and Targa line with turbocharged engines for 10 models (for now). We’re told that when this news was announced last year, it sparked a run on the former, naturally aspirated 911s. Granted, the new engine has a plastic intake and oil sump, so all that is good and right in the world seems to be ending. But plastic is lighter than aluminum, and its durability was proven by getting a factory forklift driver to repeatedly drop the fully assembled and dressed engine onto concrete from a height of about seven feet. Really—we saw video of it.
Having driven many versions of the new turbo car, including now this C4S, we think the fever to grab a free-breather before they were gone, while understandable, was misplaced. The 991.2-generation, as Porsche is calling the repowered version, is definitely better, more usable and flexible in a bunch of small ways, and lacks none of the spirit of the 991.1.
A new 3.0-liter flat-six fitted with intercooled snails does the motivating, and the base Carrera’s output of 370 horsepower rises to 420 in the S models, or 20 more than in the previous S versions, despite losing 0.8 liter of displacement. The 4S with the PDK automatic transmission like the one we drove sees EPA fuel-economy ratings increase from 19 mpg city and 26 mpg highway to 21/28 mpg. Which is a good thing for Porsche’s ability to meet regulatory standards, but it’s unlikely to matter to most customers who can afford a C4S.
Precious few 911s list for less than six-figure prices these days—in fact, just two, the base coupe at $90,450 and the base Carrera 4 coupe at $97,350—but we’re told that the typical 911 buyer spends between $15,000 and $19,000 on options. So be sure to leave room on your personal check for extra zeros.
To go from Carrera to Carrera S costs $14,000, and from Carrera S to 4S costs another $6900. This car is not a cheap pleasure but a handsome reward for a life lived rather profitably. A life which Porsche itself is definitely living, to the great envy of other carmakers, with line items such as this S trim in which the extra coin buys, basically, a larger turbo compressor, some software, and a few interior and exterior goodies. If it costs Porsche more than a grand to install the S option, we’ll eat our free Porsche hats. The all-wheel-drive system, at least, involves significant hardware and engineering relative to the more modest price increase.
But that’s between Porsche and its buyers. Our $138,560 Carrera 4S in Graphite Blue Metallic ($710), with a leather interior in Graphite Blue and Chalk ($4280), included a $6810 Sport package with the new rear-axle steering system, a more vocal exhaust, and the smaller GT steering wheel. It also had the PDK dual-clutch automatic ($3200) in place of the standard seven-speed manual, the hella-big Premium Plus package ($3970), and the front-axle lift system ($2590) among the 12 line-item options on its window sticker. You see how it goes with the extras, and this example likely is representative of how a customer would order a Carrera 4S.

Equipped for Year-Round Daily Duty

The maturing of the Carrera from ultimate 1960s compact sports machine into supreme luxury GT was already well underway before across-the-board turbos came along. But that said, the amazing thing about the 911 is how well it adapts to different roles, from the track-attacker GT3 RS (as yet, still non-turbo) to this Carrera 4S, which is about as luxurious as they come. The 4S is an all-weather torpedo for crossing borders and time zones in swift, sure-footed comfort. To Porsche’s credit, it has not sold its all-wheel-drive system as a performance upgrade but more as a capability enhancer. The engineers at Weissach are too honest to hide the fact that, unless the torque split is heavily rear biased, all-wheel drive—which increases curb weight—tends to heighten understeer at the limit. The sales pitch hasn’t changed except that, now, given launch control and the traction of all four wheels, Porsche modestly suggests that a 4S may be a tiny smidge quicker to 60 mph than an S. It quotes 4S acceleration figures ranging from 3.6 seconds for a PDK with launch control to 4.0 seconds for a manual.
Figuring the rain had given the car a suitable challenge, we threw it hard into the first corner, only to have it slip sideways a foot on all four wheels. This was less instructive about its overall grip than about how Porsche has massaged the stability control with a new Sport mode that allows more driver freedom. At the same time, the damper-response envelope has been tweaked to make the ride less crusty in Sport and Sport Plus modes, which are now selected with a four-position dial on a pod emanating from the steering wheel. The extra cushioning in the suspension is welcome, even if the superwide tires, 245/35 in front and 305/30 out back, still generate a lot of white noise in the cabin.
Continuing on the rain-soaked road, we treated the puddles with a little more respect, but we still found the 4S clawed hard into the pavement. Even though the peak engine torque of 368 lb-ft (up 43 from the 991.1 S) starts dissipating above 5000 rpm, the needle goes all the way to 7500 before hitting red. “Just for fun,” an engineer told us. Well, it is fun to wind out the engine, the lovely steel-cut brrr of the flat-six out back coming through the firewall partly via a passive sound tube off the intake, but there’s not much to be gained by doing so. At 2000 rpm in a low gear and with your foot in it, the C4S is already approaching full steam. Being able to let it rev out to 7500 rpm does give the driver the option of delaying an upshift until the road, or the car’s attitude, straightens out.
Postponed reaction, though, is purely a matter of choice. Turbo lag has been engineered out so thoroughly that less-informed owners (these exist even among 911 buyers) may struggle to recall whether their cars have turbos or not. You can drop the windows and work the throttle to hear the faint but telltale heavy breathing, but otherwise the new Carrera is just a very nice car with a very nice engine. The sport exhaust brings in slightly more crackle, but there’s a certain robotic repeatability to the backfiring it does when you lift or downshift. Even knowing that the three perfect pops from the tailpipe are a bit of electromechanical theater staged by the car’s computer, it’s still fun to hear it.
Only the Carrera 4S cabriolet, perhaps, could be regarded as a less hard-core 911 than the Carrera 4S coupe, but having done wheel time in both, we can say that turbochargers have not dimmed the model’s incandescence one bit. Alternatives like the Mercedes-AMG GT and the Audi R8 may offer more power (for more money, it should be noted), but the 911 remains the sportiest and most unfiltered of the $100,000-plus luxury-coupe choices, and we suspect this will continue to be the case for as long as Porsche purists keep the, er, pressure on.

2016 Honda Civic Coupe 1.5T CVT

An engaging coupe from the one-time maker of engaging coupes.

The old Civic coupe is a minivan. Not literally. But after driving the new one, last year’s model feels—there’s no nice way to put this—like a gigantic Cheerio depository.
Gone are the thick and distant A-pillars, and the busy two-tier instrument panel is also out, replaced by a big tachometer front and center with a digital speedo inside. Honda moved the hip point—where your glutes hit the seat—way down. As you sit closer to the ground, the narrower A-pillars and the simple and elegant dashboard work to erase that old minivan feeling. The mom jeans are off; the Civic is back to being a car, a very good one.
Taut suspension tuning means body motions are quickly damped, and the steering is alive. There’s a Volkswagen GTI–like eagerness to the turn-in, complemented by excellent cornering stability. Skidpad grip is an unimpressive 0.83 g, mostly due to the all-season rubber, but every bit of that grip is accessible and easy to modulate. A firm brake pedal provides the right amount of initial bite, although the brakes did exhibit slight fade at the track. In testing, the sixth successive stop from 70 mph measured 10 feet more than the first stop, but the pedal pressure remained constant and secure.
A new structure lies under the new skin. Honda claims it’s 25 percent stiffer than before. The structure dispatches big jolts with the brief tuung! of a tightly tuned tom-tom. Its predecessor had a hollow and weedier structure that couldn’t adequately suppress the engine or the ­suspension. Tire noise is still intrusive on concrete freeways, but the engine seems farther away now, and there’s virtually no wind noise. You don’t hear much at 70 mph, just 67 decibels of tire and mechanical hum, a five-decibel improvement over the old coupe.
Honda claims that the coupe’s unibody is 76 pounds lighter than before, and it may be. But with all the pieces attached and a new turbocharged 1.5-liter four, this car weighs 2882 pounds, or 31 more than the last coupe we tested. That slight weight gain is more than offset by the engine, which makes 31 more horsepower and 33 more pound-feet of torque than the old 1.8-liter. Acceleration to 60 mph takes 6.6 seconds, a full two seconds quicker than before.
At this point, Honda’s CVT automatic is the sole transmission for the 1.5-liter turbo. A big serving of turbo torque starts below 2000 rpm and keeps the CVT from having to zing into the higher revs in normal driving. In drive or sport mode, the transmission “shifts” virtual gears and the changing revs eliminate the unrelenting high-rpm wail characteristic of CVTs. In low mode, the CVT does hold the engine near the redline from about 40 mph until the governor engages at 125 mph. We achieved the quickest acceleration times with the transmission in low. Stepping through the fake gears added a couple of tenths to zero-to-60 runs. And unlike the previous car’s CVT, there isn’t any way to select or hold “gears” if you wish to shift for yourself.
For now, manual enthusiasts have to settle for the naturally aspirated 158-hp 2.0-liter. Paired with the manual, the 2.0-liter has the rev-happy character of Honda engines past. But the easy torque and the extra horsepower of the turbo engine is seductive, so you may want to wait until later this year when Honda will offer a six-speed manual with the 1.5-liter turbo four.
In our hands, the EX-L with the 1.5-liter returned 29 mpg. EPA estimates are forthcoming, but we are told by Honda to expect an improvement: 31 city and 41 highway.
A Civic coupe with a sensible instrument-panel layout, engaging dynamics, and attractive styling? Welcome back, Honda.
In addition to the old alien-spacecraft console, designers wisely threw out every other aspect of the previous ­generation. Material quality is hugely improved and the electric parking brake allows for a cavernous center console, but we’d still like to have a volume knob instead of having to swipe the border of the touchscreen. The seat cushions are Porsche firm, but some riders might find the lumbar support excessive.
Much of the exterior seems to have been designed to highlight the Civic’s 1.8-inch-wider body. A chrome nose ring sits just above knee height, and the rear fenders flare out below the pinched-in rear window. The wheelbase has grown by 3.1 inches to 106.3, but the overall length is down an inch. Along with the added width, the longer wheelbase shortens overhangs and yields an assertive stance. The rear end is perhaps the oddest part of the styling, bulging outward in a way that may conjure up images of a robot with a full diaper.
The Civic coupe is a return to form for Honda. But as good as the Civic is, we would wait for the turbo to hook up with the manual before signing any forms.

Tuesday, May 3, 2016

Elegance and modernity combined with breathtaking views of Lisbon, the Corinthia Hotel is a landmark of the city. The Executive Club rooms and suites offer its guest’s personalised experiences and direct access to the Executive Club Sky Lounge, a unique space with world-class service. From leisure to fine dining, our restaurants and bar combine a relaxed and intimate ambiance with the best of Portuguese cuisine. The leisure area includes a Spa with an innovative concept that can guide you to a healthier, happier and longer life. The Corinthia Hotel Lisbon is the ideal base for both leisure and business travellers.
                                                       

JustForex

Categories

Unordered List

Sample Text

Powered by Blogger.

Sample text

Social Icons

Followers

Featured Posts

Social Icons

Pages

Popular Posts

Recent Posts

Text Widget